Saturday January 27, 2018
By Mukhtar M. Ibrahim
A
federal judge in Miami ruled Friday that his court has jurisdiction to
hear a lawsuit challenging the deportation of 92 Somalis who are in
detention centers in Florida.
The undocumented men and women were
on a botched deportation flight on Dec. 7 bound for Somalia that was
rerouted back to the U.S. after it made a stop in the West African
country of Senegal.
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles had
extended several times a temporary hold on the deportation of the
Somalis, saying he needed time to weigh whether he has jurisdiction over
the case. The government had argued that the court doesn't have
jurisdiction to hear the detainees' cases.
In December, several
detainees on the flight filed a class action lawsuit that claimed the
men and women should not be deported because of the escalation of
violence carried out by the terrorist group al-Shabab in Somalia and the
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's failed attempt to send them
to the East African nation.
Some of those on the flight said in
the lawsuit that immigration agents physically and verbally abused them
during the flight, which lasted for 40 hours, including 23 hours when
the flight was on the ground at an airport in the Senegalese capital of
Dakar.
"Based on the unique circumstances of this case, including
the botched flight, the resulting news coverage, and escalation of
violence in Somalia, the Court finds it has limited jurisdiction to
ensure Petitioners are able to exercise rights afforded to them under
U.S. law," Gayles wrote in his ruling on Friday.
The detainees
have requested the court stay their removal so they could apply to
"reopen their removal cases to assert claims for asylum, withholding of
removal, or relief under" the international convention against torture,
according to a court document.
The government has argued that the Somalis could try to reopen their cases from Somalia. But Gayles said that was impossible.
"The
Court finds troubling that the government would seek to immediately
re-remove Petitioners when their claims arose, in great part, from the
government's own alleged misconduct," Gayles wrote. "Petitioners cannot
effectively pursue motions to reopen from Somalia where they would
likely be forced underground to avoid persecution immediately upon
arrival. The Court is unpersuaded by the government's position that
Petitioners can meaningfully pursue a motion to reopen from Somalia. It
is unclear how Petitioners could access their immigration files or
witnesses in the United States with relevant information pertaining to
the December 7th flight, all the while attempting to avoid persecution
in Somalia."
A status conference on the case is scheduled for Feb. 1 at 10 a.m. at the United States District Court in Miami.